lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP01T74steDfP6O8QOshoto3e3RnHhKtAeTbnrPBZS3YJXjvbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:15:11 +0200
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] A couple of small refactorings of BPF
 program call sites

On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 00:42, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 8/18/22 6:59 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Stanislav suggested[0] that these small refactorings could be split out from the
> > XDP queueing RFC series and merged separately. The first change is a small
> > repacking of struct softnet_data, the others change the BPF call sites to
> > support full 64-bit values as arguments to bpf_redirect_map() and as the return
> > value of a BPF program, relying on the fact that BPF registers are always 64-bit
> > wide to maintain backwards compatibility.
> >
> > Please see the individual patches for details.
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKH8qBtdnku7StcQ-SamadvAF==DRuLLZO94yOR1WJ9Bg=uX1w@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (1):
> >    bpf: Use 64-bit return value for bpf_prog_run
> >
> > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (2):
> >    dev: Move received_rps counter next to RPS members in softnet data
> >    bpf: Expand map key argument of bpf_redirect_map to u64
>
> Looks like this series throws NULL pointer derefs in the CI. I just reran it and
> same result whereas various other bpf-next targeted patches CI seems green and w/o
> below panic ... perhaps an issue in last patch; please investigate.

Was it only occurring with LLVM before, or with GCC too?

>
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7982907380?check_suite_focus=true
>

I've been trying to reproduce this for a day with no luck. First I did
it with GCC, then I noticed that the CI is only red for LLVM, so I
also tried with LLVM 16.

I'll keep trying, but just wanted to update the thread. Also, would
there be a way to look at logs of the past runs (that you saw and then
triggered this failing run again)? Maybe their splat has some
difference which might provide more clues.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ