netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] ethtool: add interface to interact with Ethernet Power Equipment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220825111019.1dc3dae0@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:10:19 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] ethtool: add interface to interact with
 Ethernet Power Equipment

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:02:10 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> +enum ethtool_podl_pse_admin_state {
> +	ETHTOOL_PODL_PSE_ADMIN_STATE_UNKNOWN = 1,

Why define UNKNOWN.. as 1? No real objection here, just in my head
somehow UNKNOWN = 0 or just start from 1.

> +	ETHTOOL_PODL_PSE_ADMIN_STATE_DISABLED,
> +	ETHTOOL_PODL_PSE_ADMIN_STATE_ENABLED,
> +
> +	/* add new constants above here */
> +	ETHTOOL_PODL_PSE_ADMIN_STATE_COUNT

Why define count for a value enum like this? For attrs we define it
because it's used to size tables, don't think anyone will size tables
based on states.

There's a bunch of kdoc warnings in the patches as well.