netdev - [PATCH v3 2/9] lib/test_cpumask: Make test_cpumask_last check for nr_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220825181210.284283-3-vschneid@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:12:03 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] lib/test_cpumask: Make test_cpumask_last check for nr_cpu_ids bits

test_cpumask_last() currently fails on a system with
  CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64
  CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n
  nr_cpu_ids < NR_CPUS

  [   14.088853]     # test_cpumask_last: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_cpumask.c:77
  [   14.088853]     Expected ((unsigned int)64) - 1 == cpumask_last(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)), but
  [   14.088853]         ((unsigned int)64) - 1 == 63
  [   14.088853]         cpumask_last(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)) == 3
  [   14.090435]     not ok 3 - test_cpumask_last

Per smp.c::setup_nr_cpu_ids(), nr_cpu_ids <= NR_CPUS, so we want
the test to use nr_cpu_ids rather than nr_cpumask_bits.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
---
 lib/test_cpumask.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
index a31a1622f1f6..81b17563fcb3 100644
--- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static void test_cpumask_first(struct kunit *test)
 
 static void test_cpumask_last(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpumask_bits, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpumask_bits - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_last(&mask_empty));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_cpu_ids - 1, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask));
 }
 
 static void test_cpumask_next(struct kunit *test)
-- 
2.31.1