lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220826084249.1031557-1-michael@walle.cc> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:42:49 +0200 From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> To: divya.koppera@...rochip.com Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: micrel: Adding SQI support for lan8814 phy Hi, > Supports SQI(Signal Quality Index) for lan8814 phy, where > it has SQI index of 0-7 values and this indicator can be used > for cable integrity diagnostic and investigating other noise > sources. > > Signed-off-by: Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com> > --- > drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c > index e78d0bf69bc3..3775da7afc64 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c > @@ -1975,6 +1975,13 @@ static int ksz886x_cable_test_get_status(struct phy_device *phydev, > #define LAN8814_CLOCK_MANAGEMENT 0xd > #define LAN8814_LINK_QUALITY 0x8e > > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL 0xe6 > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL_READ_CAPTURE_ BIT(15) Why does it end with an underscore? > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL_CHANNEL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0) > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_SQI 0xe4 > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_SQI_MAX 7 > +#define LAN8814_DCQ_SQI_VAL_MASK GENMASK(3, 1) > + > static int lanphy_read_page_reg(struct phy_device *phydev, int page, u32 addr) > { > int data; > @@ -2927,6 +2934,32 @@ static int lan8814_probe(struct phy_device *phydev) > return 0; > } > > +static int lan8814_get_sqi(struct phy_device *phydev) > +{ > + int rc, val; > + > + val = lanphy_read_page_reg(phydev, 1, LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL); > + if (val < 0) > + return val; > + > + val &= ~LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL_CHANNEL_MASK; I do have a datasheet for this PHY, but it doesn't mention 0xe6 on EP1. So I can only guess that this "channel mask" is for the 4 rx/tx pairs on GbE? And you only seem to evaluate one of them. Is that the correct thing to do here? -michael > + val |= LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL_READ_CAPTURE_; > + rc = lanphy_write_page_reg(phydev, 1, LAN8814_DCQ_CTRL, val); > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + > + rc = lanphy_read_page_reg(phydev, 1, LAN8814_DCQ_SQI); > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + > + return FIELD_GET(LAN8814_DCQ_SQI_VAL_MASK, rc); > +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists