[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220829121324.3980376-1-vladbu@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:13:24 +0200
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <maord@...dia.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
<leon@...nel.org>, <roid@...dia.com>, <jiri@...dia.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] Revert "net: devlink: add RNLT lock assertion to devlink_compat_switch_id_get()"
This reverts commit 6005a8aecee8afeba826295321a612ab485c230e.
The assertion was intentionally removed in commit 043b8413e8c0 ("net:
devlink: remove redundant rtnl lock assert") and, contrary what is
described in the commit message, the comment reflects that: "Caller must
hold RTNL mutex or reference to dev...".
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
---
net/core/devlink.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 2afbeb6eca67..0f7078db1280 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -12505,8 +12505,6 @@ int devlink_compat_switch_id_get(struct net_device *dev,
* devlink_port instance cannot disappear in the middle. No need to take
* any devlink lock as only permanent values are accessed.
*/
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
devlink_port = netdev_to_devlink_port(dev);
if (!devlink_port || !devlink_port->switch_port)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists