lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6a29d21-5c90-ca6d-8060-56088882a776@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:04:26 +0800
From:   shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <jhs@...atatu.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_api: remove redundant 0 check in
 tcf_qevent_init()



On 2022/9/1 3:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:17:20 +0800 Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>> tcf_qevent_parse_block_index() has been checked the value of block_index.
> 
> Please rephrase this:
> 
>    tcf_qevent_parse_block_index() never returns a zero block_index.
> 
> Took me a while to figure out what you mean.
> 
>> Therefore, it is unnecessary to check the value of block_index in
>> tcf_qevent_init().

Hi Jakub:
	Thank you for your reply. I will send v2.

Zhengchao Shao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ