[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25b7e8c8-1eba-1a8d-138b-988dabeeb2ae@digikod.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 10:09:41 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yusongping@...wei.com,
hukeping@...wei.com, anton.sirazetdinov@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/18] seltests/landlock: add rules overlapping test
On 29/08/2022 19:03, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> This patch adds overlapping rules for one port. First rule adds just
> bind() access right for a port. The second one adds both bind() and
> connect() access rights for the same port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v6:
> * None.
>
> Changes since v5:
> * Formats code with clang-format-14.
>
> Changes since v4:
> * Refactors code with self->port, self->addr4 variables.
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Adds ruleset_overlap test.
>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> index 40aef7c683af..b3b38745f4eb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> @@ -464,4 +464,93 @@ TEST_F(socket, connect_afunspec_with_restictions)
> ASSERT_EQ(1, WIFEXITED(status));
> ASSERT_EQ(EXIT_SUCCESS, WEXITSTATUS(status));
> }
> +
> +TEST_F(socket, ruleset_overlap)
> +{
> + int sockfd;
> + int one = 1;
> +
> + struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> + .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
> + };
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_1 = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
> +
> + .port = self->port[0],
> + };
> +
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_2 = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
> +
> + .port = self->port[0],
> + };
> +
> + int ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /* Allows bind operations to the port[0] socket. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_1, 0));
> + /* Allows connect and bind operations to the port[0] socket. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_2, 0));
> +
> + /* Enforces the ruleset. */
> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /* Creates a server socket. */
> + sockfd = create_socket_variant(variant, SOCK_STREAM);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, sockfd);
> + /* Allows to reuse of local address. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &one,
> + sizeof(one)));
> +
> + /* Binds the socket to address with port[0]. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, bind_variant(variant, sockfd, self, 0));
> +
> + /* Makes connection to socket with port[0]. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, connect_variant(variant, sockfd, self, 0));
> +
> + /* Closes socket. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(sockfd));
> +
> + /* Creates another ruleset layer. */
> + ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /*
> + * Allows bind operations to the port[0] socket in
> + * the new ruleset layer.
> + */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_1, 0));
> +
> + /* Enforces the new ruleset. */
> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /* Creates a server socket. */
> + sockfd = create_socket_variant(variant, SOCK_STREAM);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, sockfd);
> + /* Allows to reuse of local address. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &one,
> + sizeof(one)));
> +
> + /* Binds the socket to address with port[0]. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, bind_variant(variant, sockfd, self, 0));
> +
> + /*
> + * Forbids to connect the socket to address with port[0],
> + * cause just one ruleset layer has connect() access rule.
s/cause/because/ (everywhere)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists