[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d91e3fcc-2320-e98c-7d54-458b749c87a8@digikod.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 10:09:51 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yusongping@...wei.com,
hukeping@...wei.com, anton.sirazetdinov@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/18] seltests/landlock: add invalid input data test
On 29/08/2022 19:03, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> This patch adds rules with invalid user space supplied data:
> - out of range ruleset attribute;
> - unhandled allowed access;
> - zero port value;
> - zero access value;
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v6:
> * Adds invalid ruleset attribute test.
>
> Changes since v5:
> * Formats code with clang-format-14.
>
> Changes since v4:
> * Refactors code with self->port variable.
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Adds inval test.
>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> index a93224d1521b..067ba45f58a5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,12 @@
>
> #define IP_ADDRESS "127.0.0.1"
>
> -/* Number pending connections queue to be hold */
> +/* Number pending connections queue to be hold. */
Patch of a previous patch?
> #define BACKLOG 10
>
> +/* Invalid attribute, out of landlock network access range. */
> +#define LANDLOCK_INVAL_ATTR 7
> +
> FIXTURE(socket)
> {
> uint port[MAX_SOCKET_NUM];
> @@ -719,4 +722,65 @@ TEST_F(socket, ruleset_expanding)
> /* Closes socket 1. */
> ASSERT_EQ(0, close(sockfd_1));
> }
> +
> +TEST_F(socket, inval)
> +{
> + struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
> + .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP
> + };
> + struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr_inval = {
> + .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_INVAL_ATTR
Please add a test similar to TEST_F_FORK(layout1,
file_and_dir_access_rights) instead of explicitly defining and only
testing LANDLOCK_INVAL_ATTR.
> + };
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_1 = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
> + .port = self->port[0],
> + };
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_2 = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
> + .port = 0,
> + };
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_3 = {
> + .allowed_access = 0,
> + .port = self->port[1],
> + };
> + struct landlock_net_service_attr net_service_4 = {
> + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP,
> + .port = self->port[2],
> + };
> +
> + /* Checks invalid ruleset attribute. */
> + const int ruleset_fd_inv = landlock_create_ruleset(
> + &ruleset_attr_inval, sizeof(ruleset_attr_inval), 0);
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, ruleset_fd_inv);
> + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
> +
> + /* Gets ruleset. */
> + const int ruleset_fd =
> + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
> + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd);
> +
> + /* Checks unhandled allowed_access. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_1, 0));
> + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
> +
> + /* Checks zero port value. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_2, 0));
> + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
> +
> + /* Checks zero access value. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_3, 0));
> + ASSERT_EQ(ENOMSG, errno);
> +
> + /* Adds with legitimate values. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_SERVICE,
> + &net_service_4, 0));
> +
> + /* Enforces the ruleset. */
> + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
> +}
> TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists