lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220912173553.235838-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:35:53 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [Patch net] tcp: read multiple skbs in tcp_read_skb()

From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>

Before we switched to ->read_skb(), ->read_sock() was passed with
desc.count=1, which technically indicates we only read one skb per
->sk_data_ready() call. However, for TCP, this is not true.

TCP at least has sk_rcvlowat which intentionally holds skb's in
receive queue until this watermark is reached. This means when
->sk_data_ready() is invoked there could be multiple skb's in the
queue, therefore we have to read multiple skbs in tcp_read_skb()
instead of one.

Fixes: 965b57b469a5 ("net: Introduce a new proto_ops ->read_skb()")
Reported-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 3488388eea5d..e373dde1f46f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1761,19 +1761,28 @@ int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
 	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
 		return -ENOTCONN;
 
-	skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
-	if (!skb)
-		return 0;
+	while ((skb = tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset)) != NULL) {
+		u8 tcp_flags;
+		int used;
 
-	__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk));
-	copied = recv_actor(sk, skb);
-	if (copied >= 0) {
-		seq += copied;
-		if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN)
+		__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk));
+		tcp_flags = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags;
+		used = recv_actor(sk, skb);
+		consume_skb(skb);
+		if (used < 0) {
+			if (!copied)
+				copied = used;
+			break;
+		}
+		seq += used;
+		copied += used;
+
+		if (tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN) {
 			++seq;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
-	consume_skb(skb);
 	WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, seq);
 
 	tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ