[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f2824bc776f4383b84e4137f6c740de@prolan.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:04:56 +0000
From: Csókás Bence <Csokas.Bence@...lan.hu>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Bence Csókás <bence98@....bme.hu>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard
`fep->ptp_clk_on`"
> This is not a 100% revert.
>
> In b353b241f1eb ("net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard `fep->ptp_clk_on`")
> the "struct fec_enet_private *fep" was renamed to "struct
> fec_enet_private *adapter" for no apparent reason. The driver uses "fep"
> everywhere else. This revert doesn't restore the original state.
You got that backwards. b353b241f1eb renamed `adapter` to `fep` to align
it with the rest of the driver. I decided to amend the revert to keep this renaming.
`adapter` was introduced in 6605b73 when `fec_ptp.c` was created.
> This leads to the following diff against a 100% revert.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> index c99dff3c3422..c74d04f4b2fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> @@ -365,21 +365,21 @@ static int fec_ptp_adjtime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s64 delta)
> */
> static int fec_ptp_gettime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> - struct fec_enet_private *fep =
> + struct fec_enet_private *adapter =
Here you can clearly see the nature of my amend. I thought I added this to the commit message,
but it seems I have forgot.
Bence
Powered by blists - more mailing lists