[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <855e9d047fba033af54c2368091d0c6e102d6f86.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:51:13 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Revert fec PTP changes
On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 09:45 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 12.09.22 14:38, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 02:28:57PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > On 12.09.2022 09:01:41, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > > Revert the last 2 FEC PTP changes from Csókás Bence, they are causing multiple
> > > > issues and we are at 6.0-rc5.
> > > >
> > > > Francesco Dolcini (2):
> > > > Revert "fec: Restart PPS after link state change"
> > > > Revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard `fep->ptp_clk_on`"
> > >
> > > Nitpick: I would revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard
> > > `fep->ptp_clk_on`" first, as it's the newer patch.
> >
> > Shame on me, I do 100% agree, I inverted the 2 patches last second.
>
> What's the status of this patchset? It seems it didn't make any progress
> in the past few days, or am I missing something?
Due to some unfortunate circumstances, we have quite a bit of backlog
in the netdev patchwork. We are working to process it, and the above
revert will be processed before the next rc.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists