netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/17] pull-request: can 2022-09-20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220920122246.00dbe946@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:22:46 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/17] pull-request: can 2022-09-20

On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:28:58 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> The next 15 patches are by Anssi Hannula and Jimmy Assarsson and fix
> various problem in the kvaser_usb CAN driver.

These are large patches which don't clearly justify the classification
as a fix. Patches 6 and 8 for example leave me asking "what does this
fix?" It's good to report errors, but the absence of error reporting
is not necessarily a bug worthy of stable.

Can we get the commit messages beefed up?