lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923062114.7db02bce@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:21:14 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers <oss-drivers@...igine.com>,
        Fei Qin <fei.qin@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] nfp: add support for link auto negotiation

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 04:37:58 +0000 Yinjun Zhang wrote:
> > I can't parse what this is saying but doesn't look good  
> 
> I think this comment is clear enough. In previous `
> nfp_net_pf_cfg_nsp`, hwinfo "sp_indiff" is configured into Management
> firmware(NSP), and it decides if autoneg is supported or not and
> updates eth table accordingly. And only `CHANGED` flag is set here so
> that with some delay driver can get the updated eth table instead of
> stale info.

Why is the sp_indif thing configured at the nfp_main layer, before 
the eth table is read? Doing this inside nfp_net_main seems like 
the wrong layering to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ