netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 12:27:07 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support

On 22-09-22, 00:46, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Thank you for your comment!
> 
> > From: Jakub Kicinski, Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 11:40 PM
> > 
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:47:37 +0900 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support
> > 
> > I think you may be slightly confused about the use of the treewide
> > prefix. Perhaps Geert or one of the upstream-savvy contractors could
> > help you navigate targeting the correct trees?
> 
> I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide:
> 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or
>    change multiple subsystems in a patch.
> 2) Convenient for review.
> 
> This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use
> treewide for the 1) only?

No, How is it convenient for review.. I would like to see a series just
for phy... I dont need to see the whole other things...

Maybe Convenient for you to toss the pile to upstream reviewers, surely
not for us!

-- 
~Vinod