lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <TYBPR01MB5341791936EB2C724C753FFDD8529@TYBPR01MB5341.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:21:37 +0000 From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>, "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>, "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support Hi Vinod, > From: Vinod Koul, Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2022 3:57 PM > > On 22-09-22, 00:46, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > Hi Jakub, > > > > Thank you for your comment! > > > > > From: Jakub Kicinski, Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 11:40 PM > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:47:37 +0900 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support > > > > > > I think you may be slightly confused about the use of the treewide > > > prefix. Perhaps Geert or one of the upstream-savvy contractors could > > > help you navigate targeting the correct trees? > > > > I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide: > > 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or > > change multiple subsystems in a patch. > > 2) Convenient for review. > > > > This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use > > treewide for the 1) only? > > No, How is it convenient for review.. I would like to see a series just > for phy... I dont need to see the whole other things... > > Maybe Convenient for you to toss the pile to upstream reviewers, surely > not for us! Thank you very much for your comments. I understood it. I will not submit this type of treewide from now on. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists