[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202209300525.ZhOI7VN4-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 06:04:34 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v4] xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO
Hi Christian,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec/master]
[also build test ERROR on net-next/master net/master linus/master v6.0-rc7 next-20220929]
[cannot apply to klassert-ipsec-next/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Langrock/xfrm-replay-Fix-ESN-wrap-around-for-GSO/20220929-195233
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git master
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-func
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/48e26cc03f8bd9712712a13b50c4fbed615beaf2
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Christian-Langrock/xfrm-replay-Fix-ESN-wrap-around-for-GSO/20220929-195233
git checkout 48e26cc03f8bd9712712a13b50c4fbed615beaf2
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/iommu/ fs/ net/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:754:13: error: static declaration of 'xfrm_replay_overflow_check' follows non-static declaration
754 | static bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:10:
include/net/xfrm.h:1752:6: note: previous declaration of 'xfrm_replay_overflow_check' with type 'bool(struct xfrm_state *, struct sk_buff *)' {aka '_Bool(struct xfrm_state *, struct sk_buff *)'}
1752 | bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c:754:13: warning: 'xfrm_replay_overflow_check' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
754 | static bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/xfrm_replay_overflow_check +754 net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
753
> 754 static bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
755 {
756 struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
757 __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
758
759 /* We assume that this function is called with
760 * skb_is_gso(skb) == true
761 */
762
763 if (x->repl_mode == XFRM_REPLAY_MODE_ESN) {
764 if (x->type->flags & XFRM_TYPE_REPLAY_PROT) {
765 oseq = oseq + 1 + skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
766 if (unlikely(oseq < replay_esn->oseq))
767 return true;
768 }
769 }
770
771 return false;
772 }
773
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (167503 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists