netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: prestera: acl: Add check for kmemdup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220930072952.2d337b3a@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:29:52 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, tchornyi@...vell.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: prestera: acl: Add check for kmemdup

On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:03:17 +0800 Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Actually, I used get_maintainer scripts and the results is as follow:
> "./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_acl.c"
> Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com> (supporter:MARVELL PRESTERA ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER)
> "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
> 
> Therefore, I submitted my patch to the above addresses.
> 
> And this time I checked the fixes commit, and found that it has two
> authors:
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> Maybe there is a problem of the script that misses one.
> Anyway, I have already submitted the same patch and added
> "vmytnyk@...vell.com" this time.

Ha! So you do indeed use it in a way I wasn't expecting :S
Thanks for the explanation.

Joe, would you be okay to add a "big fat warning" to get_maintainer
when people try to use the -f flag? Maybe we can also change the message
that's displayed when the script is run without arguments to not
mention -f?

We're getting quite a few fixes which don't CC author, I'm guessing
Jiasheng's approach may be a common one.