lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221003095048.1a683ba7@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 09:50:48 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: drop netif_attrmask_next*()

On Sun,  2 Oct 2022 08:16:58 -0700 Yury Norov wrote:
> netif_attrmask_next_and() generates warnings if CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> is enabled.

Could you describe the nature of the warning? Is it a false positive 
or a legit warning?

If the former perhaps we should defer until after the next merge window.

> It is used in a single place. netif_attrmask_next() is not
> used at all. With some rework of __netif_set_xps_queue(), we can drop
> both functions, switch the code to well-tested bitmap API and fix the
> warning.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ