lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:15:58 +0200 From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> To: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com> Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, monil191989@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec,v2] xfrm: fix "disable_policy" on ipv4 early demux Le 10/10/2022 à 14:52, Eyal Birger a écrit : [snip] >> Thanks. Is it possible to write a selftest with this scenario? > > I can add one targeting ipsec-next. > > Do you perhaps know which is the current preferred flavor for such selftests > for ipsec - C or bash? I would say bash. There are a lot of examples here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/net Regards, Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists