lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ee967071-abbe-c0e3-db96-6963d1b886b2@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:08:34 -0700 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@...ent.de> Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFH, where did I go wrong? On 10/12/22 14:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2022, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> I guess RTNL is not held at this point. > OIC, so it’s held for .init and .reset but not the other methods. > I wish this were documented… RTNL being a mutex it only can be acquired in process context. qdisc fast path (queue/dequeue) can be called from (soft)irq context, so RTNL is out of reach. > > Looking good so far. Thank you very much! > > bye, > //mirabilos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists