netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 02/18] landlock: refactor landlock_find_rule/insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:13:41 +0300
From:   "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
CC:     <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, <gnoack3000@...il.com>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <yusongping@...wei.com>,
        <hukeping@...wei.com>, <anton.sirazetdinov@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/18] landlock: refactor
 landlock_find_rule/insert_rule



10/12/2022 1:06 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
> 
> On 12/10/2022 10:37, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 9/6/2022 11:07 AM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
>>> Good to see such clean commit!
>>>
>>> On 29/08/2022 19:03, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
>>>> Adds a new landlock_key union and landlock_id structure to support
>>>> a socket port rule type. Refactors landlock_insert_rule() and
>>>> landlock_find_rule() to support coming network modifications.
>>>
>>>> This patch also adds is_object_pointer() and get_root() helpers.
>>>
>>> Please explain a bit what these helpers do.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now adding or searching a rule in a ruleset depends on a landlock id
>>>> argument provided in refactored functions mentioned above.
>>>
>>> More explanation:
>>> A struct landlock_id identifies a unique entry in a ruleset: either a
>>> kernel object (e.g inode) or a typed data (e.g. TCP port). There is one
>>> red-black tree per key type.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Because most changes come from
>>> https://git.kernel.org/mic/c/8f4104b3dc59e7f110c9b83cdf034d010a2d006f
>>> and
>>> https://git.kernel.org/mic/c/7d6cf40a6f81adf607ad3cc17aaa11e256beeea4
>>> you can append
>>> Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>> 
>>     Do I need to add Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>     and Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> or just
>>     Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> ????
>> 
>>     Cause Submiting patches article says:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
>> 
>>     "...Since Co-developed-by: denotes authorship, every Co-developed-by:
>> must be immediately followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated
>> co-author...."
>> 
>>     Is this correct signing for this patch:
>> 
>>     Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>     Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>     Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
> 
> Because I'll merge your patches in my tree, I'll add my Signed-off-by to
> all patches. You can then just add Co-developed-by after your
> Signed-off-by for this one and I'll add the rest.

   Ok. I got it. Thanks for the explaning.
> .