[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0g3tW26qDDaxYPP@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:07:17 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] net: phylink: add phylink_set_mac_pm() helper
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:39:02AM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> Per Russell's suggestion, the implementation is changed from the helper
> function to add an extra property in phylink_config structure because this
> change can easily cover SFP usecase too.
Which tree are you aiming this for - net-next or net?
You should use [PATCH net ...] or [PATCH net-next ...] to indicate which
tree you're aiming these patches for.
Please don't repost due to this unless you want it to go into the net
tree, as net-next is currently closed.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists