[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLja=eQHbsM_Ta2sQF0tOGU8vAGrh_izRuuHjuO1ouUag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:09:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, kraig@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, kuni1840@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] udp: Update reuse->has_conns under reuseport_lock.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:28 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:59:43 -0700
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:53 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > When we call connect() for a UDP socket in a reuseport group, we have
> > > to update sk->sk_reuseport_cb->has_conns to 1. Otherwise, the kernel
> > > could select a unconnected socket wrongly for packets sent to the
> > > connected socket.
> > >
> > > However, the current way to set has_conns is illegal and possible to
> > > trigger that problem. reuseport_has_conns() changes has_conns under
> > > rcu_read_lock(), which upgrades the RCU reader to the updater. Then,
> > > it must do the update under the updater's lock, reuseport_lock, but
> > > it doesn't for now.
> > >
> > > For this reason, there is a race below where we fail to set has_conns
> > > resulting in the wrong socket selection. To avoid the race, let's split
> > > the reader and updater with proper locking.
> > >
> > > cpu1 cpu2
> > > +----+ +----+
> > >
> > > __ip[46]_datagram_connect() reuseport_grow()
> > > . .
> > > |- reuseport_has_conns(sk, true) |- more_reuse = __reuseport_alloc(more_socks_size)
> > > | . |
> > > | |- rcu_read_lock()
> > > | |- reuse = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_reuseport_cb)
> > > | |
> > > | | | /* reuse->has_conns == 0 here */
> > > | | |- more_reuse->has_conns = reuse->has_conns
> > > | |- reuse->has_conns = 1 | /* more_reuse->has_conns SHOULD BE 1 HERE */
> > > | | |
> > > | | |- rcu_assign_pointer(reuse->socks[i]->sk_reuseport_cb,
> > > | | | more_reuse)
> > > | `- rcu_read_unlock() `- kfree_rcu(reuse, rcu)
> > > |
> > > |- sk->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED
> > >
> > > Fixes: acdcecc61285 ("udp: correct reuseport selection with connected sockets")
> > > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > * Fix build failure for CONFIG_IPV6=m
> > > * Drop SO_INCOMING_CPU fix, which will be sent for net-next
> > > after the v6.1 merge window
> > >
> > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20221010174351.11024-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> > > ---
> > > include/net/sock_reuseport.h | 11 +++++------
> > > net/core/sock_reuseport.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > net/ipv4/datagram.c | 2 +-
> > > net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 +-
> > > net/ipv6/datagram.c | 2 +-
> > > net/ipv6/udp.c | 2 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/sock_reuseport.h b/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> > > index 473b0b0fa4ab..efc9085c6892 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> > > @@ -43,21 +43,20 @@ struct sock *reuseport_migrate_sock(struct sock *sk,
> > > extern int reuseport_attach_prog(struct sock *sk, struct bpf_prog *prog);
> > > extern int reuseport_detach_prog(struct sock *sk);
> > >
> > > -static inline bool reuseport_has_conns(struct sock *sk, bool set)
> > > +static inline bool reuseport_has_conns(struct sock *sk)
> > > {
> > > struct sock_reuseport *reuse;
> > > bool ret = false;
> > >
> > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > reuse = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_reuseport_cb);
> > > - if (reuse) {
> > > - if (set)
> > > - reuse->has_conns = 1;
> > > - ret = reuse->has_conns;
> > > - }
> > > + if (reuse && reuse->has_conns)
> > > + ret = true;
> > > rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +void reuseport_has_conns_set(struct sock *sk);
> > > +
> > > #endif /* _SOCK_REUSEPORT_H */
> > > diff --git a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> > > index 5daa1fa54249..abb414ed4aa7 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,21 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(reuseport_ida);
> > > static int reuseport_resurrect(struct sock *sk, struct sock_reuseport *old_reuse,
> > > struct sock_reuseport *reuse, bool bind_inany);
> > >
> > > +void reuseport_has_conns_set(struct sock *sk)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sock_reuseport *reuse;
> > > +
> > > + if (!rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock(&reuseport_lock);
> > > + reuse = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_reuseport_cb,
> > > + lockdep_is_held(&reuseport_lock));
> >
> > Could @reuse be NULL at this point ?
> >
> > Previous test was performed without reuseport_lock being held.
>
> Usually, sk_reuseport_cb is changed under lock_sock().
>
> The only exception is reuseport_grow() & TCP reqsk migration case.
>
> 1) shutdown() TCP listener, which is moved into the latter part of
> reuse->socks[] to migrate reqsk.
>
> 2) New listen() overflows reuse->socks[] and call reuseport_grow().
>
> 3) reuse->max_socks overflows u16 with the new listener.
>
> 4) reuseport_grow() pops the old shutdown()ed listener from the array
> and update its sk->sk_reuseport_cb as NULL without lock_sock().
>
> shutdown()ed sk->sk_reuseport_cb can be changed without lock_sock().
>
> But, reuseport_has_conns_set() is called only for UDP and under
> lock_sock(), so @reuse never be NULL in this case.
Given the complexity of this code and how much time is needed to
review all possibilities, please add an additional
if (reuse)
reuse->has_conns = 1;
I doubt anyone will object to such safety measures.
Thanks.
>
>
> > > + reuse->has_conns = 1;
> > > + spin_unlock(&reuseport_lock);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reuseport_has_conns_set);
> > > +
> > > static int reuseport_sock_index(struct sock *sk,
> > > const struct sock_reuseport *reuse,
> > > bool closed)
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/datagram.c b/net/ipv4/datagram.c
> > > index 405a8c2aea64..5e66add7befa 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/datagram.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/datagram.c
> > > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int __ip4_datagram_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len
> > > }
> > > inet->inet_daddr = fl4->daddr;
> > > inet->inet_dport = usin->sin_port;
> > > - reuseport_has_conns(sk, true);
> > > + reuseport_has_conns_set(sk);
> > > sk->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
> > > sk_set_txhash(sk);
> > > inet->inet_id = prandom_u32();
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > > index d63118ce5900..29228231b058 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > > @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(struct net *net,
> > > result = lookup_reuseport(net, sk, skb,
> > > saddr, sport, daddr, hnum);
> > > /* Fall back to scoring if group has connections */
> > > - if (result && !reuseport_has_conns(sk, false))
> > > + if (result && !reuseport_has_conns(sk))
> > > return result;
> > >
> > > result = result ? : sk;
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/datagram.c b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
> > > index df665d4e8f0f..5ecb56522f9d 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv6/datagram.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
> > > @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ int __ip6_datagram_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - reuseport_has_conns(sk, true);
> > > + reuseport_has_conns_set(sk);
> > > sk->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
> > > sk_set_txhash(sk);
> > > out:
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> > > index 91e795bb9ade..56e4523a3004 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> > > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup2(struct net *net,
> > > result = lookup_reuseport(net, sk, skb,
> > > saddr, sport, daddr, hnum);
> > > /* Fall back to scoring if group has connections */
> > > - if (result && !reuseport_has_conns(sk, false))
> > > + if (result && !reuseport_has_conns(sk))
> > > return result;
> > >
> > > result = result ? : sk;
> > > --
> > > 2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists