[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0bafb4-6c62-dab3-c98a-40de41422071@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 17:38:11 +0800
From: shangxiaojing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: virtual_ncidev: Fix memory leak in
virtual_nci_send()
On 2022/10/18 17:32, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2022-10-17 at 16:44 +0800, Shang XiaoJing wrote:
>> skb should be free in virtual_nci_send(), otherwise kmemleak will report
>> memleak.
>>
>> Steps for reproduction (simulated in qemu):
>> cd tools/testing/selftests/nci
>> make
>> ./nci_dev
>>
>> BUG: memory leak
>> unreferenced object 0xffff888107588000 (size 208):
>> comm "nci_dev", pid 206, jiffies 4294945376 (age 368.248s)
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> backtrace:
>> [<000000008d94c8fd>] __alloc_skb+0x1da/0x290
>> [<00000000278bc7f8>] nci_send_cmd+0xa3/0x350
>> [<0000000081256a22>] nci_reset_req+0x6b/0xa0
>> [<000000009e721112>] __nci_request+0x90/0x250
>> [<000000005d556e59>] nci_dev_up+0x217/0x5b0
>> [<00000000e618ce62>] nfc_dev_up+0x114/0x220
>> [<00000000981e226b>] nfc_genl_dev_up+0x94/0xe0
>> [<000000009bb03517>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.14+0x228/0x2d0
>> [<00000000b7f8c101>] genl_rcv_msg+0x35c/0x640
>> [<00000000c94075ff>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11e/0x350
>> [<00000000440cfb1e>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
>> [<0000000062593b40>] netlink_unicast+0x43f/0x640
>> [<000000001d0b13cc>] netlink_sendmsg+0x73a/0xbf0
>> [<000000003272487f>] __sys_sendto+0x324/0x370
>> [<00000000ef9f1747>] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdd/0x1b0
>> [<000000001e437841>] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
>>
>> Fixes: e624e6c3e777 ("nfc: Add a virtual nci device driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c b/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
>> index f577449e4935..9f54a4e0eb51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
>> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static int virtual_nci_send(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> send_buff = skb_copy(skb, GFP_KERNEL);
>> mutex_unlock(&nci_mutex);
>> wake_up_interruptible(&wq);
>> + consume_skb(skb);
>
> Looking at the nci core, it seems to me that the send op takes full
> ownership of the skb argument. That is, you need to additionally free
> it even on error paths.
right, will be fixed in patch v2.
Thanks,
Shang XiaoJing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists