[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b8c8764-052a-97b3-bf5b-8335a75c11d9@tessares.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:22:40 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/5] inet6: Remove inet6_destroy_sock() in
sk->sk_prot->destroy().
Hi Kuniyuki,
+cc MPTCP ML.
On 18/10/2022 21:09, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> After commit d38afeec26ed ("tcp/udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock()
> in IPv6 sk->sk_destruct()."), we call inet6_destroy_sock() in
> sk->sk_destruct() by setting inet6_sock_destruct() to it to make
> sure we do not leak inet6-specific resources.
>
> Now we can remove unnecessary inet6_destroy_sock() calls in
> sk->sk_prot->destroy().
>
> DCCP and SCTP have their own sk->sk_destruct() function, so we
> change them separately in the following patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> ---
> Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Thank you for the cc!
Please next time also cc MPTCP ML if you don't mind.
(...)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index f599ad44ed24..7cc9c542c768 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@
> #include <net/protocol.h>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> #include <net/tcp_states.h>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
> -#include <net/transp_v6.h>
> -#endif
Please keep this include: it is needed to access "tcpv6_prot" (as
reported by the kernel bot).
> #include <net/mptcp.h>
> #include <net/xfrm.h>
> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
> @@ -3898,12 +3895,6 @@ static const struct proto_ops mptcp_v6_stream_ops = {
>
> static struct proto mptcp_v6_prot;
>
> -static void mptcp_v6_destroy(struct sock *sk)
> -{
> - mptcp_destroy(sk);
> - inet6_destroy_sock(sk);
> -}
> -
> static struct inet_protosw mptcp_v6_protosw = {
> .type = SOCK_STREAM,
> .protocol = IPPROTO_MPTCP,
> @@ -3919,7 +3910,6 @@ int __init mptcp_proto_v6_init(void)
> mptcp_v6_prot = mptcp_prot;
> strcpy(mptcp_v6_prot.name, "MPTCPv6");
> mptcp_v6_prot.slab = NULL;
> - mptcp_v6_prot.destroy = mptcp_v6_destroy;
> mptcp_v6_prot.obj_size = sizeof(struct mptcp6_sock);
>
> err = proto_register(&mptcp_v6_prot, 1);
I see that for MPTCP IPv6 sockets, sk->sk_destruct is now set to
inet6_sock_destruct() which calls inet6_destroy_sock() via
inet6_cleanup_sock().
So all good for the MPTCP part (if you re-add the include ;) ).
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists