[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221019125040.07751ce8@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:50:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, jiri@...nulli.us, razor@...ckwall.org,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, gnault@...hat.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, fw@...len.de, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc, sven@...fation.org,
jiri@...dia.com, nhorman@...driver.com, alex.aring@...il.com,
stefan@...enfreihafen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/13] genetlink: introduce split op
representation
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:36:00 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > It's used as an output argument here, so that's what initializes it.
> > genl_get_cmd* should always init the split command because in policy
> > dumping we don't care about the errors, we just want the structure
> > to be zeroed if do/dump is not implemented, and we'll skip accordingly.
> > Wiping the 40B just to write all the fields felt... wrong.
> > Let KASAN catch us if we fail to init something.
>
> KASAN doesn't, I think, you'd need KMSAN?
Quite possibly :S Too many SANs :S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists