lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 01:20:18 +0000
From:   Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC 0/3] net: phy: marvell10g: Add host speed setting by
 an ethernet driver

Hi Russell,

> From: Russell King, Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 8:39 PM
> 
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:44:42PM +0200, Marek BehĂșn wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:50:49 +0900
> > Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> wrote:
> >
> > > R-Car S4-8 environment board requires to change the host interface
> > > as SGMII and the host speed as 1000 Mbps because the strap pin was
> > > other mode, but the SoC/board cannot work on that mode. Also, after
> > > the SoC initialized the SERDES once, we cannot re-initialized it
> > > because the initialized procedure seems all black magic...
> >
> > Can you tell us which exact mode is configured by the strapping pins?
> > Isn't it sufficient to just set the MACTYPE to SGMII, without
> > configuring speed?
> 
> (To Yoshihiro Shimoda)
> 
> Please note that I don't seem to have the patches to review - and as
> maintainer of the driver, I therefore NAK this series until I can
> review it.
> 
> I'm guessing the reason I don't have them is:
> 
> 2022-10-19 09:51:17 H=relmlor1.renesas.com (relmlie5.idc.renesas.com) [210.160.252.171]:58218 I=[78.32.30.218]:25 F=<>
> rejected RCPT <linux@...linux.org.uk>: Faked bounce
> 2022-10-19 09:51:17 H=relmlor2.renesas.com (relmlie6.idc.renesas.com) [210.160.252.172]:24399 I=[78.32.30.218]:25 F=<>
> rejected RCPT <linux@...linux.org.uk>: Faked bounce
> 2022-10-19 09:51:18 H=relmlor1.renesas.com (relmlie5.idc.renesas.com) [210.160.252.171]:58218 I=[78.32.30.218]:25 F=<>
> rejected RCPT <linux@...linux.org.uk>: Faked bounce
> 2022-10-19 09:51:19 H=relmlor1.renesas.com (relmlie5.idc.renesas.com) [210.160.252.171]:58218 I=[78.32.30.218]:25 F=<>
> rejected RCPT <linux@...linux.org.uk>: Faked bounce
> 
> Why are you sending patches using the NULL envelope sender - this is a
> common trick used by spammers and scammers to get their messages
> through. Please don't.

I'm sorry about this. I'll stop such sending patches.

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> (In case anyone questions this - as all my email is sent from encoded
> envelope from addresses rather than my published addresses, bounces
> do still work.)
> 
> Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ