[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1FydexHzzOKS1V+@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:08:21 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] dt-bindings: net: sff,sfp: update binding
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:27:44AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:31:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:28:46 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > > Add a minimum and default for the maximum-power-milliwatt option;
> > > > > module power levels were originally up to 1W, so this is the default
> > > > > and the minimum power level we can have for a functional SFP cage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > > >
> > > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > >
> > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.yaml: properties:maximum-power-milliwatt: 'minimum' should not be valid under {'enum': ['const', 'enum', 'exclusiveMaximum', 'exclusiveMinimum', 'minimum', 'maximum', 'multipleOf', 'pattern']}
> > > > hint: Scalar and array keywords cannot be mixed
> > > > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/keywords.yaml#
> > >
> > > I'm reading that error message and it means absolutely nothing to me.
> > > Please can you explain it (and also re-word it to be clearer)?
> >
> > 'maxItems' is a constraint for arrays. 'maximum' is a constraint for
> > scalar values. Mixing them does not make sense.
>
> TBC, dropping 'maxItems' is what is needed here.
So how does this work?
maxItems: 1
tells it that there should be an array of one property, which is at the
DT level fundamentally the same as a scalar property.
minimum:
default:
maximum:
tells it that this is a scalar property, so there should be exactly one
item or the property should not be mentioned?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists