lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:06:22 +0800
From:   Lu Wei <luwei32@...wei.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        <dsahern@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        <imagedong@...cent.com>, <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net,v3] tcp: fix a signed-integer-overflow bug in tcp_add_backlog()

The type of sk_rcvbuf and sk_sndbuf in struct sock is int, and
in tcp_add_backlog(), the variable limit is caculated by adding
sk_rcvbuf, sk_sndbuf and 64 * 1024, it may exceed the max value
of int and overflow. This patch reduces the limit budget by
halving the sndbuf to solve this issue since ACK packets are much
smaller than the payload.

Fixes: c9c3321257e1 ("tcp: add tcp_add_backlog()")
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@...wei.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 7a250ef9d1b7..87d440f47a70 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1874,11 +1874,13 @@ bool tcp_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	__skb_push(skb, hdrlen);
 
 no_coalesce:
+	limit = (u32)READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) + (u32)(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf) >> 1);
+
 	/* Only socket owner can try to collapse/prune rx queues
 	 * to reduce memory overhead, so add a little headroom here.
 	 * Few sockets backlog are possibly concurrently non empty.
 	 */
-	limit = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) + READ_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf) + 64*1024;
+	limit += 64 * 1024;
 
 	if (unlikely(sk_add_backlog(sk, skb, limit))) {
 		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists