lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:32:02 +0200 From: netdev@...io-technology.com To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>, Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>, Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>, Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry flag On 2022-10-20 15:06, Ido Schimmel wrote: > [...] > >> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, >> struct net_bridge *br, >> err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true); >> } else { >> spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock); >> - err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb); >> + err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags, >> nfea_tb); > > I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible. Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel itself and it did not give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready for submission'. As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something to do with perl?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists