lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:34:46 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
        Stefan Mätje <stefan.maetje@....eu>,
        Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@...nd.eu>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] can: rcar_canfd: Fix channel specific IRQ
 handling for RZ/G2L

On 26.10.2022 09:34:41, Biju Das wrote:
> > In a separate patch, please clean up these, too:
> > 
> > | static void rcar_canfd_handle_global_err(struct rcar_canfd_global
> > | *gpriv, u32 ch) static void rcar_canfd_handle_global_receive(struct
> > | rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, u32 ch) static void
> > | rcar_canfd_channel_remove(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, u32 ch)
> > 
> > Why are 2 of the above functions called "global" as they work on a
> > specific channel? That can be streamlined, too.
> > 
> 
> The function name is as per the hardware manual, Interrupt sources are
> classified into global and channel interrupts.
> 
> • Global interrupts (2 sources):
> — Receive FIFO interrupt
> — Global error interrupt
> • Channel interrupts (3 sources/channel):

I see. Keep the functions as is.

> Maybe we could change
> "rcar_canfd_handle_global_receive"->"rcar_canfd_handle_channel_receive",
> as from driver point It is not global anymore?? Please let me know.

Never mind - the gpriv and channel numbers are needed sometimes even in
the functions working on a single channel. Never mind. I'll take patches
1 and 2 as they are.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ