[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221027112955.GA17401@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:29:55 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
robin@...tonic.nl, linux@...pel-privat.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
socketcan@...tkopp.net, mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: j1939: transport: replace kfree_skb() with
dev_kfree_skb_irq()
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:12:37PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() from hardware interrupt
> context or with interrupts being disabled. The skb is unlinked
> from the queue, so it can be freed after spin_unlock_irqrestore().
>
> Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> Move kfree_skb() after spin_unlock_irqrestore().
> ---
> net/can/j1939/transport.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> index d7d86c944d76..55f29c9f9e08 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> @@ -342,10 +342,12 @@ static void j1939_session_skb_drop_old(struct j1939_session *session)
> __skb_unlink(do_skb, &session->skb_queue);
> /* drop ref taken in j1939_session_skb_queue() */
> skb_unref(do_skb);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
>
> kfree_skb(do_skb);
> + } else {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
> }
>
> void j1939_session_skb_queue(struct j1939_session *session,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists