[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221027091237.2290111-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:12:37 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <robin@...tonic.nl>, <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
<mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] can: j1939: transport: replace kfree_skb() with dev_kfree_skb_irq()
It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() from hardware interrupt
context or with interrupts being disabled. The skb is unlinked
from the queue, so it can be freed after spin_unlock_irqrestore().
Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
Move kfree_skb() after spin_unlock_irqrestore().
---
net/can/j1939/transport.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
index d7d86c944d76..55f29c9f9e08 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
@@ -342,10 +342,12 @@ static void j1939_session_skb_drop_old(struct j1939_session *session)
__skb_unlink(do_skb, &session->skb_queue);
/* drop ref taken in j1939_session_skb_queue() */
skb_unref(do_skb);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
kfree_skb(do_skb);
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
}
void j1939_session_skb_queue(struct j1939_session *session,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists