lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:56:51 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <>
To:     Cai Huoqing <>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <>,
        Eric Dumazet <>,
        Paolo Abeni <>,
        Zhengchao Shao <>,
        Bin Chen <>,
        Krzysztof WilczyƄski <>,
        Peter Chen <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: hinic: Add control command support for VF PMD
 driver in DPDK

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:56:55 +0800 Cai Huoqing wrote:
> > The commands are actually supported or you're just ignoring them
> > silently?  
> No, 

Do you mean "neither"?

> if the cmd is not added to 'nic_cmd_support_vf',
> the PF will return false, and the error messsage "PF Receive VFx
> unsupported cmd x" in the function 'hinic_mbox_check_cmd_valid',
> then, the configuration will not be set to hardware.

You're describing the behavior before the patch?

After the patch the command is ignored silently, like I said, right?
Because there is no handler added to nic_vf_cmd_msg_handler[].
Why is that okay? Or is there handler somewhere else?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists