[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR12MB53816062FAE98EEFEF319644AF349@BN9PR12MB5381.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:24:05 +0000
From: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"open list:MELLANOX ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic
thermal_zone_get_trip() function
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2022 13:32
> To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>; Vadim Pasternak
> <vadimp@...dia.com>
> Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>; rafael@...nel.org; linux-
> pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Petr Machata
> <petrm@...dia.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; open list:MELLANOX ETHERNET SWITCH
> DRIVERS <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic
> thermal_zone_get_trip() function
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:02:23AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > Because I hope I can remove the ops->get_trip_ ops from thermal_ops
> > structure before the end of this cycle.
>
> OK. Vadim, any chance you can review the patch?
It seems to be OK.
Anyway, I'll take this patch for testing by the end of this week and update.
>
> > May be you can consider moving the thermal driver into drivers/thermal?
>
> I don't think it's worth the hassle (if possible at all). In practice, this code is
> upstream for almost six years and IIRC we didn't have any conflicts with the
> thermal tree. I don't expect conflicts this cycle either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists