Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:57:07 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Bezdeka, Florian" <florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        "alexandr.lobakin@...el.com" <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        "anatoly.burakov@...el.com" <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
        "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
        "Deric, Nemanja" <nemanja.deric@...mens.com>,
        "andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
        "Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        "magnus.karlsson@...il.com" <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        "willemb@...gle.com" <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>, "yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
        "kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mtahhan@...hat.com" <mtahhan@...hat.com>,
        "xdp-hints@...-project.net" <xdp-hints@...-project.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        "haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [xdp-hints] Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/5] xdp: hints via kfuncs

On 10/31/22 10:00 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> 2. AF_XDP programs won't be able to access the metadata without using a
>> custom XDP program that calls the kfuncs and puts the data into the
>> metadata area. We could solve this with some code in libxdp, though; if
>> this code can be made generic enough (so it just dumps the available
>> metadata functions from the running kernel at load time), it may be
>> possible to make it generic enough that it will be forward-compatible
>> with new versions of the kernel that add new fields, which should
>> alleviate Florian's concern about keeping things in sync.
> 
> Good point. I had to convert to a custom program to use the kfuncs :-(
> But your suggestion sounds good; maybe libxdp can accept some extra
> info about at which offset the user would like to place the metadata
> and the library can generate the required bytecode?
> 
>> 3. It will make it harder to consume the metadata when building SKBs. I
>> think the CPUMAP and veth use cases are also quite important, and that
>> we want metadata to be available for building SKBs in this path. Maybe
>> this can be resolved by having a convenient kfunc for this that can be
>> used for programs doing such redirects. E.g., you could just call
>> xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb() before doing the bpf_redirect, and that
>> would recursively expand into all the kfunc calls needed to extract the
>> metadata supported by the SKB path?
> 
> So this xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb will create a metadata layout that

Can the xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb be written as a bpf prog itself?
Not sure where is the best point to specify this prog though.  Somehow during 
bpf_xdp_redirect_map?
or this prog belongs to the target cpumap and the xdp prog redirecting to this 
cpumap has to write the meta layout in a way that the cpumap is expecting?


> the kernel will be able to understand when converting back to skb?
> IIUC, the xdp program will look something like the following:
> 
> if (xdp packet is to be consumed by af_xdp) {
>    // do a bunch of bpf_xdp_metadata_<metadata> calls and assemble your
> own metadata layout
>    return bpf_redirect_map(xsk, ...);
> } else {
>    // if the packet is to be consumed by the kernel
>    xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb(ctx);
>    return bpf_redirect(...);
> }
> 
> Sounds like a great suggestion! xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb can maybe
> put some magic number in the first byte(s) of the metadata so the
> kernel can check whether xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb has been called
> previously (or maybe xdp_frame can carry this extra signal, idk).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists