netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: addrlabel: fix infoleak when sending struct ifaddrlblmsg to network

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000000000000c2709105eca2960b@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 04 Nov 2022 03:32:21 -0700
From:   syzbot 
        <syzbot+3553517af6020c4f2813f1003fe76ef3cbffe98d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, glider@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: addrlabel: fix infoleak when sending struct
 ifaddrlblmsg to network

> When copying a `struct ifaddrlblmsg` to the network, __ifal_reserved
> remained uninitialized, resulting in a 1-byte infoleak:
>
>   BUG: KMSAN: kernel-network-infoleak in __netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
>    __netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4841
>    netdev_start_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:4857
>    xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3590
>    dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1dc/0x800 net/core/dev.c:3606
>    __dev_queue_xmit+0x17e8/0x4350 net/core/dev.c:4256
>    dev_queue_xmit ./include/linux/netdevice.h:3009
>    __netlink_deliver_tap_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:307
>    __netlink_deliver_tap+0x728/0xad0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:325
>    netlink_deliver_tap net/netlink/af_netlink.c:338
>    __netlink_sendskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1263
>    netlink_sendskb+0x1d9/0x200 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1272
>    netlink_unicast+0x56d/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1360
>    nlmsg_unicast ./include/net/netlink.h:1061
>    rtnl_unicast+0x5a/0x80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:758
>    ip6addrlbl_get+0xfad/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:628
>    rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
>   ...
>   Uninit was created at:
>    slab_post_alloc_hook+0x118/0xb00 mm/slab.h:742
>    slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3398
>    __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4f2/0x930 mm/slub.c:3437
>    __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:954
>    __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x117/0x3d0 mm/slab_common.c:975
>    kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:437
>    __alloc_skb+0x27a/0xab0 net/core/skbuff.c:509
>    alloc_skb ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1267
>    nlmsg_new ./include/net/netlink.h:964
>    ip6addrlbl_get+0x490/0x10f0 net/ipv6/addrlabel.c:608
>    rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xb33/0x1570 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082
>    netlink_rcv_skb+0x299/0x550 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
>    rtnetlink_rcv+0x26/0x30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6109
>    netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
>    netlink_unicast+0x9ab/0xf50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
>    netlink_sendmsg+0xebc/0x10f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
>   ...
>
> This patch ensures that the reserved field is always initialized.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+3553517af6020c4f2813f1003fe76ef3cbffe98d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 2a8cc6c89039 ("[IPV6] ADDRCONF: Support RFC3484 configurable address selection policy table.")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/addrlabel.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
> index 8a22486cf2702..17ac45aa7194c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrlabel.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ static void ip6addrlbl_putmsg(struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  {
>  	struct ifaddrlblmsg *ifal = nlmsg_data(nlh);
>  	ifal->ifal_family = AF_INET6;
> +	ifal->__ifal_reserved = 0;
>  	ifal->ifal_prefixlen = prefixlen;
>  	ifal->ifal_flags = 0;
>  	ifal->ifal_index = ifindex;
> -- 
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
>

I see the command but can't find the corresponding bug.
The email is sent to  syzbot+HASH@...kaller.appspotmail.com address
but the HASH does not correspond to any known bug.
Please double check the address.