[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68896ba9-68c6-1f7a-3c6c-c3ee3c98e32f@hartkopp.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 21:33:16 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dariusz Stojaczyk <Dariusz.Stojaczyk@...nsynergy.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Max Staudt <max@...as.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/5] can: dev: fix skb drop check
Hi Jakub,
On 04.11.22 19:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> - if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
>> + if (can_dev_dropped_skb(dev, skb))
>
> Compiler says "Did you mean ndev"?
Your compiler is a smart buddy! Sorry!
Marc added that single change to my patch for the pch_can.c driver
(which is removed in net-next but not in 6.1-rc).
And in pch_can.c the netdev is named ndev.
Would you like to fix this up on your own or should we send an updated
PR for the series?
Many thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists