[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221104153611.53758e3a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:36:11 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dariusz Stojaczyk <Dariusz.Stojaczyk@...nsynergy.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Max Staudt <max@...as.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/5] can: dev: fix skb drop check
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 21:33:16 +0100 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 04.11.22 19:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> - if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
> >> + if (can_dev_dropped_skb(dev, skb))
> >
> > Compiler says "Did you mean ndev"?
>
> Your compiler is a smart buddy! Sorry!
>
> Marc added that single change to my patch for the pch_can.c driver
> (which is removed in net-next but not in 6.1-rc).
>
> And in pch_can.c the netdev is named ndev.
>
> Would you like to fix this up on your own or should we send an updated
> PR for the series?
Updated PR would be better, if possible.
We don't edit patches locally much (at all?) when applying to netdev.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists