[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7389601-40aa-2372-b185-387bd20fe701@hartkopp.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 10:01:15 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dariusz Stojaczyk <Dariusz.Stojaczyk@...nsynergy.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Max Staudt <max@...as.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/5] can: dev: fix skb drop check
On 04.11.22 23:36, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 21:33:16 +0100 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> On 04.11.22 19:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> - if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
>>>> + if (can_dev_dropped_skb(dev, skb))
>>>
>>> Compiler says "Did you mean ndev"?
>>
>> Your compiler is a smart buddy! Sorry!
>>
>> Marc added that single change to my patch for the pch_can.c driver
>> (which is removed in net-next but not in 6.1-rc).
>>
>> And in pch_can.c the netdev is named ndev.
>>
>> Would you like to fix this up on your own or should we send an updated
>> PR for the series?
>
> Updated PR would be better, if possible.
> We don't edit patches locally much (at all?) when applying to netdev.
Ok, thanks!
I have posted another patch which could be added to the updated PR too then.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20221104142551.16924-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/T/#u
Best regards,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists