netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: fix policy dump for dumps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221108154426.3a882067@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:44:26 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "Jonathan Lemon" <bsd@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: fix policy dump for dumps

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:47:57 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> A little bit tricky code here, but it makes sense. We could rewrite this to be a bit more verbose like:
> 
> doit_err = genl_get_cmd(.. GENL_CMD_CAP_DO ..);
> dumpit_err = genl_get_cmd(.. GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMPIT ..);
> if (doit_err && dumpit_err) {
>   ...
> }
> 
> That might be a bit easier to read than the !! ( ) + ( ) < 1 notation.

True, I should not give into the bit math temptations.

How about a helper:

diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index 9b7dfc45dd67..600993c80050 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ genl_cmd_full_to_split(struct genl_split_ops *op,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* Must make sure that op is initialized to 0 on failure */
 static int
 genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct genl_family *family,
 	     struct genl_split_ops *op)
@@ -302,6 +303,21 @@ genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct genl_family *family,
 	return err;
 }
 
+/* For policy dumping only, get ops of both do and dump.
+ * Fail if both are missing, genl_get_cmd() will zero-init in case of failure.
+ */
+static int
+genl_get_cmd_both(u32 cmd, const struct genl_family *family,
+		  struct genl_split_ops *doit, struct genl_split_ops *dumpit)
+{
+	int err1, err2;
+
+	err1 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, family, doit);
+	err2 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, family, dumpit);
+
+	return err1 && err2 ? -ENOENT : 0;
+}
+
 static bool
 genl_op_iter_init(const struct genl_family *family, struct genl_op_iter *iter)
 {
@@ -1406,10 +1422,10 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		ctx->single_op = true;
 		ctx->op = nla_get_u32(tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
 
-		if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, rt, &doit) &&
-		    genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, rt, &dump)) {
+		err = genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, rt, &doit, &dump);
+		if (err) {
 			NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(cb->extack, tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
-			return -ENOENT;
+			return err;
 		}
 
 		if (doit.policy) {
@@ -1551,13 +1567,9 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		if (ctx->single_op) {
 			struct genl_split_ops doit, dumpit;
 
-			if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
-					 ctx->rt, &doit) &&
-			    genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
-					 ctx->rt, &dumpit)) {
-				WARN_ON(1);
+			if (WARN_ON(genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, ctx->rt,
+						      &doit, &dumpit)))
 				return -ENOENT;
-			}
 
 			if (ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op(skb, cb, &doit, &dumpit))
 				return skb->len;
-- 
2.38.1