[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB5089B5FB303D6B29367E0FF3D63F9@CO1PR11MB5089.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 23:49:10 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...a.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: fix policy dump for dumps
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 3:44 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; edumazet@...gle.com;
> pabeni@...hat.com; Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...a.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: fix policy dump for dumps
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:47:57 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > A little bit tricky code here, but it makes sense. We could rewrite this to be a bit
> more verbose like:
> >
> > doit_err = genl_get_cmd(.. GENL_CMD_CAP_DO ..);
> > dumpit_err = genl_get_cmd(.. GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMPIT ..);
> > if (doit_err && dumpit_err) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > That might be a bit easier to read than the !! ( ) + ( ) < 1 notation.
>
> True, I should not give into the bit math temptations.
>
> How about a helper:
>
Much better, the little explanation about the zero init helps too.
Thanks,
Jake
> diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
> index 9b7dfc45dd67..600993c80050 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ genl_cmd_full_to_split(struct genl_split_ops *op,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Must make sure that op is initialized to 0 on failure */
> static int
> genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct genl_family *family,
> struct genl_split_ops *op)
> @@ -302,6 +303,21 @@ genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct
> genl_family *family,
> return err;
> }
>
> +/* For policy dumping only, get ops of both do and dump.
> + * Fail if both are missing, genl_get_cmd() will zero-init in case of failure.
> + */
> +static int
> +genl_get_cmd_both(u32 cmd, const struct genl_family *family,
> + struct genl_split_ops *doit, struct genl_split_ops *dumpit)
> +{
> + int err1, err2;
> +
> + err1 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, family, doit);
> + err2 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, family, dumpit);
> +
> + return err1 && err2 ? -ENOENT : 0;
> +}
> +
> static bool
> genl_op_iter_init(const struct genl_family *family, struct genl_op_iter *iter)
> {
> @@ -1406,10 +1422,10 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct
> netlink_callback *cb)
> ctx->single_op = true;
> ctx->op = nla_get_u32(tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
>
> - if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, rt, &doit) &&
> - genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, rt, &dump)) {
> + err = genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, rt, &doit, &dump);
> + if (err) {
> NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(cb->extack, tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
> - return -ENOENT;
> + return err;
> }
>
> if (doit.policy) {
> @@ -1551,13 +1567,9 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> netlink_callback *cb)
> if (ctx->single_op) {
> struct genl_split_ops doit, dumpit;
>
> - if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
> - ctx->rt, &doit) &&
> - genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
> - ctx->rt, &dumpit)) {
> - WARN_ON(1);
> + if (WARN_ON(genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, ctx->rt,
> + &doit, &dumpit)))
> return -ENOENT;
> - }
>
> if (ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op(skb, cb, &doit, &dumpit))
> return skb->len;
> --
> 2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists