[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221109110538.431355ba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:05:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Bo.Jiao@...iatek.com,
sujuan.chen@...iatek.com, ryder.Lee@...iatek.com,
evelyn.tsai@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, daniel@...rotopia.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, kvalo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
> this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
> (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
> the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
> there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
> go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
> one. Any opinions?
Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime.
While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists