[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1a5c144-1d16-a65e-f629-c9d13946377a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:24:00 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Bo.Jiao@...iatek.com, sujuan.chen@...iatek.com,
ryder.Lee@...iatek.com, evelyn.tsai@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
daniel@...rotopia.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, kvalo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC
On 09/11/2022 20:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
>> this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
>> (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
>> the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
>> there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
>> go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
>> one. Any opinions?
>
> Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
> Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime.
>
> While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?
Please beware that the first patch should go through my tree. Let me know when
things got merged and I'll take it.
Regards,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists