[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2v+igz0TJ8LSsFj@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:24:58 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Bo.Jiao@...iatek.com, sujuan.chen@...iatek.com,
ryder.Lee@...iatek.com, evelyn.tsai@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
daniel@...rotopia.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, kvalo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
> > this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
> > (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
> > the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
> > there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
> > go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
> > one. Any opinions?
>
> Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
> Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime.
ack, thanks :)
>
> While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?
not yet, I addressed Krzysztof's comments on v3 in v4 so I am waiting for a new
review.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists