lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 21:34:18 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, brgl@...ev.pl, limings@...dia.com,
        chenhao288@...ilicon.com, huangguangbin2@...wei.com,
        Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] mlxbf_gige: add BlueField-3 Serdes
 configuration

On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:33:47 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:47:51PM -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> > The BlueField-3 out-of-band Ethernet interface requires
> > SerDes configuration. There are two aspects to this:
> > 
> > Configuration of PLL:
> >     1) Initialize UPHY registers to values dependent on p1clk clock
> >     2) Load PLL best known values via the gateway register
> >     3) Set the fuses to tune up the SerDes voltage
> >     4) Lock the PLL
> >     5) Get the lanes out of functional reset.
> >     6) Configure the UPHY microcontroller via gateway reads/writes
> > 
> > Configuration of lanes:
> >     1) Configure and open TX lanes
> >     2) Configure and open RX lanes  
> 
> I still don't like all these black magic tables in the driver.
> 
> But lets see what others say.

Well, the patch was marked as Changes Requested so it seems that DaveM
concurs :) (I'm slightly desensitized to those tables because they
happen in WiFi relatively often.)

The recommendation is to come up with a format for a binary file, load
it via FW loader and then parse in the kernel?

We did have a recommendation against parsing FW files in the kernel at
some point, too, but perhaps this is simple enough to pass.

Should this be shared infra? The problem is fairly common.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ