[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114205143.717fd03f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:51:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (repost) net-next] sched: add extack for tfilter_notify
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:07:21 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > IDK, we can have a kernel hook into the trace point and generate
> > the output over netlink, like we do with drop monitor and skb_free().
> > But I really doubt that its worth it. Also you can put a USDT into OvS
> > if you don't want to restart it. There are many options, not everything
> > is a nail :S
>
> I have finished a patch with TCA_NTF_WARN_MSG to carry the string message.
> But looks our discussion goes to a way that this feature is not valuable?
>
> So maybe I should stop on here?
It's a bit of a catch 22 - I don't mind the TCA_NTF_WARN_MSG itself
but I would prefer for the extack via notification to spread to other
notifications.
If you have the code ready - post it, let's see how folks feel after
sleeping on it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists