[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3eN5cdYxPMSJzHL@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:51:33 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 0/2] mv88e6xxx: Add MAB offload support
> Would it not be appropriate to have a define that specifies the
> value instead of the same value two places as it is now?
Yes.
> And in so case, what would be an appropriate name?
MV88E6XXX_WAIT_TIMEOUT_MS ?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists