netdev - Re: [PATCH net] unix: Fix race in SOCK_SEQPACKET's unix_dgram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:46:55 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
To:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] unix: Fix race in SOCK_SEQPACKET's
 unix_dgram_sendmsg()

On 20.11.2022 12:09, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From:   Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
> Date:   Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:16:47 +0300
>> There is a race resulting in alive SOCK_SEQPACKET socket
>> may change its state from TCP_ESTABLISHED to TCP_CLOSE:
>>
>> unix_release_sock(peer)                  unix_dgram_sendmsg(sk)
>>   sock_orphan(peer)
>>     sock_set_flag(peer, SOCK_DEAD)
>>                                            sock_alloc_send_pskb()
>>                                              if !(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)
>>                                                OK
>>                                            if sock_flag(peer, SOCK_DEAD)
>>                                              sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE
>>   sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK
>>
>>
>> After that socket sk remains almost normal: it is able to connect, listen, accept
>> and recvmsg, while it can't sendmsg.
> 
> nit: Then, also recvmsg() fails with -ENOTCONN.  And after connect(), even
> both of recvmsg() and sendmsg() does not fail.

Possible, I wrote not clear. I mean sendmsg fails after connect, while recvmsg does not fail :)
Here is sendmsg abort path:

unix_dgram_sendmsg()
  sock_alloc_send_pskb()
    if (sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)
      FAIL

> static int unix_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 				  size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> 
> 	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> 		return -ENOTCONN;
> 
> 	return unix_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, size, flags);
> }
> 
> 
>>
>> Since this is the only possibility for alive SOCK_SEQPACKET to change
>> the state in such way, we should better fix this strange and potentially
>> danger corner case.
>>
>> Also, move TCP_CLOSE assignment for SOCK_DGRAM sockets under state lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
> 
> Fixes tag is needed:
> 
> Fixes: 83301b5367a9 ("af_unix: Set TCP_ESTABLISHED for datagram sockets too")
>> Before this commit, there was no state change and SEQPACKET sk also went
> through the same path.  The bug was introduced because the commit did not
> consider SEAPACKET.
> 
> So, I think the fix should be like below, then we can free the peer faster.
> Note unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup() is dgram-specific too.
>
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index b3545fc68097..be40023a61fb 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2001,11 +2001,14 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>  		err = 0;
>  		if (unix_peer(sk) == other) {
>  			unix_peer(sk) = NULL;
> -			unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(sk, other);
> +
> +			if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM) {
> +				unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(sk, other);
> +				sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> +			}
>  
>  			unix_state_unlock(sk);
>  
> -			sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>  			unix_dgram_disconnected(sk, other);
>  			sock_put(other);
>  			err = -ECONNREFUSED;
> ---8<---
> 
> Also, it's better to mention that moving TCP_CLOSE under the lock resolves
> another rare race with unix_dgram_connect() for DGRAM sk:
> 
>   unix_state_unlock(sk);
>   <--------------------------> connect() could set TCP_ESTABLISHED here.
>   sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;

Sounds good, I'll test this variant. Thanks!

Kirill

>> ---
>>  net/unix/af_unix.c |   11 +++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> index b3545fc68097..6fd745cfc492 100644
>> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> @@ -1999,13 +1999,20 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>>  			unix_state_lock(sk);
>>  
>>  		err = 0;
>> -		if (unix_peer(sk) == other) {
>> +		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
>> +			/* We are here only when racing with unix_release_sock()
>> +			 * is clearing @other. Never change state to TCP_CLOSE
>> +			 * unlike SOCK_DGRAM wants.
>> +			 */
>> +			unix_state_unlock(sk);
>> +			err = -EPIPE;
>> +		} else if (unix_peer(sk) == other) {
>>  			unix_peer(sk) = NULL;
>>  			unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(sk, other);
>>  
>> +			sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>>  			unix_state_unlock(sk);
>>  
>> -			sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>>  			unix_dgram_disconnected(sk, other);
>>  			sock_put(other);
>>  			err = -ECONNREFUSED;