netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] net: devlink: devlink_nl_info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:43:11 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: devlink: devlink_nl_info_fill: populate
 default information

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:33:58 +0900 Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > I think 2/ is best because it will generalize to serial numbers while
> > 1/ will likely not. 3/ is a smaller gain.
> >
> > Jiri already plumbed thru the struct devlink_info_req which is on the
> > stack of the caller, per request, so we can add the bool / bitmap for
> > already reported items there quite easily.  
> 
> Sorry, let me clarify the next actions. Are you meaning that Jiri is
> already working on the bitmap implementation and should I wait for his
> patches first? Or do you expect me to do it?

Dunno if the question still stands but we already have 
struct devlink_info_req and can put the bitmap in it.
All drivers use devlink helpers to add attributes.